Brief Summary
This YouTube video features a discussion on various topics related to the Malayalam film industry, including the Dileep case, the stance of actors, issues within the AMMA organization, and censorship. The speaker shares personal experiences, opinions on industry dynamics, and political views, providing a comprehensive overview of the challenges and changes within the industry.
- The Dileep case and related controversies are discussed, including the involvement of Pulsar Suni and the reactions of various individuals.
- The importance of actors taking a stand on issues and the potential consequences they may face.
- Issues within the AMMA organization, including resignations, gender representation, and internal conflicts.
- Censorship and political interference in the film industry, with specific examples like the controversy surrounding the film "Janaki vs. State of Kerala."
Introduction
The speaker begins by questioning whether those who speak always listen, suggesting that some individuals in the Malayalam film industry consider him a leader. He mentions a plan to form a new committee, but notes the limited presence of younger generations.
Dileep Case and Related Issues
The discussion shifts to the Dileep case, mentioning Pulsar Suni's involvement and his attempt to take an actress in 2011-12. The speaker questions the logic of persuading someone with a criminal record to commit the same crime again. He also touches on the financial aspects of the case, such as the alleged two crore rupees involved, and criticizes the media's premature disclosure of information before the charge sheet was submitted to the court.
Industry Dynamics and Personal Experiences
The speaker shares personal experiences, including instances where he faced slander and was offered jobs by individuals like Balendra Menon, Mukesh, and Edavala Babu. He also discusses the Vijay Babu case, noting that while the allegations against him have not gone away, he and his family have suffered greatly.
Actor's Stance and Social Media
The discussion explores when actors decide to take a stand and respond to societal issues. The speaker emphasizes that an actor's stance is something that is inbuilt and evolves with knowledge and understanding. He acknowledges that expressing one's stance can sometimes reduce opportunities in the film industry, but he cannot help but react to certain issues. He also mentions how social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram are used to share opinions with the public.
Baiju's Career and Overexposure
The speaker discusses actor Baiju's career, noting his talent and return to Malayalam cinema after a break. He contrasts cinema and serials, criticizing the overexposure of actors in serials. He argues that actors like Mammukka and Lal sir are not considered overexposed despite doing many films because of the great characters they have played.
Support for Dileep and Trigger Factors
The speaker explains his decision to support Dileep, stating that he knows Dileep well and likes to watch his movies. He questions why people don't watch comedies and laugh instead of complaining. He also reflects on the potential sentence Dileep could face and questions why Dileep would take such a risk, considering his intelligence and business sense.
Pulsar Suni and the Crime
The speaker questions why Dileep would involve Pulsar Suni, a production driver with a criminal record, in the crime. He argues that it would be illogical for Dileep to persuade Pulsar Suni to commit the same crime again, as the police would easily detect it by looking at history. He also points out inconsistencies in Pulsar Suni's timeline, such as mentioning Dileep's name long after being remanded.
Caucus and Legal System
The speaker discusses a caucus and a WhatsApp group involving a director from the 90s. He mentions filing a case against the director for using vulgar words and insulting him and others. He expresses his respect for femininity and sadness for the actress involved in the case, but believes there is a different conspiracy behind the crime.
WCC and Hema Committee
The speaker states that he has not told the members of the Women in Cinema Collective (WCC) about any conspiracy. He acknowledges their hard work, particularly the Hema Committee, but notes that the report did not mention anything in particular and is not taking any case. He questions how the court can prove the conspiracy, emphasizing the difficulty of proving such cases.
Aluva and Vijay Babu Case
The speaker criticizes the practice of slandering individuals in Aluva and questions whether the film industry can move forward by offering jobs based on pity. He then discusses the Vijay Babu case, reiterating that the allegations against him have not gone away and that his family has faced grief. He questions who can prove the allegations and emphasizes that if there is proof, it should be presented.
Politics and BJP
The speaker discusses his entry into politics and joining the BJP. He explains that he grew up in a communist environment but felt that the party's face and way of working changed over time. He states that he was inspired by Narendra Modiji's leadership and the developments in the country since 2014.
Censor Board and Janaki vs. State of Kerala
The speaker addresses the issue of censorship, specifically the controversy surrounding the film "Janaki vs. State of Kerala." He questions the Censor Board's decision to change the name Janaki, arguing that it is an unnecessary interference. He also discusses the mental state of people and how political parties sometimes promote religious values for vote banking.
Empuran and Movie Making
The speaker briefly mentions the movie "Empuran" and discusses the art of movie making. He emphasizes the importance of telling the story in the right way and bringing it to the audience's eyes according to the context.
Religious Thinking and Censor Board
The speaker discusses religious thinking and its impact on the censor board. He argues that people's minds have started to deteriorate and they feel insecure in their religion and community. He also questions why politicians are playing vote bank politics.
Mindset and Communal Parties
The speaker emphasizes the importance of changing one's mindset and questions the perception of certain parties as communal. He points out that many secular parties also have members from different religions. He also suggests seeking Suresh Gopi's opinion on the "Janaki vs. State of Kerala" issue, given his involvement in the film and his position as a Union Minister.
Amma Organization and Elections
The speaker discusses the AMMA organization and the upcoming elections. He notes that Mohanlal has no interest in becoming president, but many want him to take on the role. He also mentions the ad hoc committee and the need for a new committee to be formed.
General Body and Resignations
The speaker observes that only half of those who came to the general body stayed, and very few of the new young generation were present. He mentions resignations within the organization and the lack of manpower to choose a new treasurer. He encourages members to fight from within the organization and give nominations to women.
Thilakan Sir and Conflicts
The speaker reflects on his relationship with Thilakan sir, whom he considered a mentor. He mentions Thilakan sir's conflicts with Dileep and his emotional nature. He also recounts an incident where Mammookka humbly requested Thilakan sir not to say certain things.
Organization and Political Union
The speaker emphasizes the importance of the organization and its need to take decisions. He recounts an incident where Thilakan sir brought policemen to the general board, causing concern among the members. He also expresses his belief that some individuals are trying to turn the organization into a political union, which he opposes. He concludes by stating that no political parties can enter the organization and no one from the outside can comment.
